Ads Takedown
For unauthorized ads, affiliate hijacking, brand bidding abuse, misleading ad copy, and search ads that intercept branded clicks.
From $500.
Fake ads, lookalike domains, affiliate abuse, and formal domain disputes are not the same problem. AdFlagger prices each engagement by the scope of the threat, the markets affected, the evidence required, and the enforcement route that can actually reduce traffic leakage.
Tailored to your scope
Service
Work volume
Markets
Pricing follows the real threat, not a generic package.
Scope is assessed before enforcement work begins.
The goal is recovered branded demand, not another report.
AdFlagger separates monitoring, operational takedown, and formal domain dispute work because each route has different evidence, timing, cost, and expected outcome.
For unauthorized ads, affiliate hijacking, brand bidding abuse, misleading ad copy, and search ads that intercept branded clicks.
For fake, lookalike, phishing, support, offer-copying, or traffic-diversion domains that compete with your official site.
For trademark-based domain disputes where a formal procedure may be more appropriate than an operational takedown.
For ongoing visibility into branded SERPs, suspicious domains, ads, apps, channels, and recurring traffic interception.
A casino brand facing recurring affiliate ads across several markets does not require the same work as a SaaS brand with one lookalike support domain. Pricing should follow the risk and the enforcement path.
Number of ads, domains, redirects, markets, keywords, and repeat appearances.
Country, language, device, search layout, and local regulatory context.
What can be proven, which policy route applies, and what outcome is realistic.
Reporting, recurrence checks, escalation, and confirmation that the threat stopped competing for demand.
Every route is scoped differently, but the operating model stays the same: discover the threat, preserve evidence, take the right action, and verify what changed.
Identify ads, domains, redirects, channels, or SERP placements competing for branded demand.
Capture the visible journey, claims, timing, markets, source relationship, and available supporting rights.
Coordinate complaints, takedown work, or formal domain dispute preparation where the route fits.
Show what was detected, what was submitted, what changed, and where recurrence needs monitoring.
Confirm whether sources stopped appearing, were disabled, were de-indexed, or require escalation.
Watch for replacement domains, new advertisers, new redirects, or repeated traffic interception patterns.
Estimate the commercial exposure when unauthorized ads or impersonating websites divert people searching for your brand. Use your own traffic and revenue assumptions to compare the potential loss with the scope of a protection engagement.
300 potentially diverted clicks and 9 potential conversions per month.
Monthly estimate = click opportunities × diverted share ÷ 100 × conversion rate ÷ 100 × value per conversion.
Enable JavaScript to update the calculation.
The starting values are editable examples. Replace them with your own assumptions to model the revenue exposed to traffic diversion.
Bring your branded traffic figures, affected markets, and examples of suspicious ads or domains. We will discuss which service fits the problem and what the quote should cover.
A useful quote separates the work needed to find a problem, the action needed to address it, and the checks needed to confirm the result. Compare providers against the same markets, sources, and follow-up scope.
For unauthorized ads on branded searches, scope the advertisers, queries, target markets, and redirect evidence. Include follow-up checks for replacement ads. Detection and takedown are different parts of the work, so confirm which are included.
For an impersonating domain, the quote depends on the abuse, supporting evidence, relevant reporting channels, and recurrence risk. Specify whether you need the website disabled, a search result removed, or a domain dispute assessed.
Define the brands, keywords, countries, devices, and checking frequency. Then agree how findings will be reviewed and reported. If you also need enforcement, ask for that work to be listed separately from ongoing detection.
Ask for a breakdown of case preparation, representation or coordination, and separate dispute-provider fees. A formal domain dispute addresses a different outcome from an operational website takedown. Review the suitable route before budgeting.
Choose the same market and time period for your branded traffic and conversion data. A decline in official clicks is a signal to investigate; it does not identify its cause by itself.
Change the assumed diverted traffic and commercial value in the calculator. Use a conservative scenario as well as your working estimate so the budget does not depend on one unverified assumption.
Review the suspicious sources, evidence, and suitable action before committing to enforcement. After action, compare official traffic and recurring abuse against the original baseline.
