Ads Takedown
For unauthorized ads, affiliate hijacking, brand bidding abuse, misleading ad copy, and search ads that intercept branded clicks.
Fake ads, lookalike domains, affiliate abuse, and formal domain disputes are not the same problem. AdFlagger prices each engagement by the scope of the threat, the markets affected, the evidence required, and the enforcement route that can actually reduce traffic leakage.
High
Tier 1-2
Managed
Ongoing
Pricing follows the real threat, not a generic package.
Scope is assessed before enforcement work begins.
The goal is recovered branded demand, not another report.
AdFlagger separates monitoring, operational takedown, and formal domain dispute work because each route has different evidence, timing, cost, and expected outcome.
For unauthorized ads, affiliate hijacking, brand bidding abuse, misleading ad copy, and search ads that intercept branded clicks.
For fake, lookalike, phishing, support, offer-copying, or traffic-diversion domains that compete with your official site.
For trademark-based domain disputes where a formal procedure may be more appropriate than an operational takedown.
For ongoing visibility into branded SERPs, suspicious domains, ads, apps, channels, and recurring traffic interception.
A casino brand facing recurring affiliate ads across several markets does not require the same work as a SaaS brand with one lookalike support domain. Pricing should follow the risk and the enforcement path.
Number of ads, domains, redirects, markets, keywords, and repeat appearances.
Country, language, device, search layout, and local regulatory context.
What can be proven, which policy route applies, and what outcome is realistic.
Reporting, recurrence checks, escalation, and confirmation that the threat stopped competing for demand.
Every route is scoped differently, but the operating model stays the same: discover the threat, preserve evidence, take the right action, and verify what changed.
Identify ads, domains, redirects, channels, or SERP placements competing for branded demand.
Capture the visible journey, claims, timing, markets, source relationship, and available supporting rights.
Coordinate complaints, takedown work, or formal domain dispute preparation where the route fits.
Show what was detected, what was submitted, what changed, and where recurrence needs monitoring.
Confirm whether sources stopped appearing, were disabled, were de-indexed, or require escalation.
Watch for replacement domains, new advertisers, new redirects, or repeated traffic interception patterns.